格差を縮める緑の恩恵
News Release from University of Glasgow on November 6, 2008
(C) flickr & CatDancing
裕福な人々と貧困に苦しむ人々では健康状態に差があることが知られているが,英国で行われた研究によると,公園,森林,運動場など緑の多い環境ではこの差が小さいことが示された。研究では,約4,100万人の健康状態を死亡率や死因で評価した。すると,最も緑の多い環境では最も少ない環境と比べて,収入の違いによる健康状態の差が半減しており,特に循環器系の病気による死亡で緑の影響が大きかったそうだ。緑の恩恵を利用して,貧富の差による健康状態の不平等を小さくできるかもしれない。(吉田素子)
Researchers(1) from the University of Glasgow have found that the health gap between the rich and poor is much lower in areas with the greenest(2) environments.
The findings are published in this week’s Social Determinants(3) of Health Special Issue(4) of The Lancet(5). The research was led by Dr Richard Mitchell from the University’s Department of Public Health(6) and Health Policy(7).
Studies have shown that exposure to(8) ‘green space’ - such as parks, forests and playing fields(9) - has an independent(10) beneficial effect(11) on health and health-related(12) behaviours(13). The authors proposed that income-related inequality(14) in health would be lower in populations with greater exposure to green space, since access to(15) such areas can affect the pathways(16) through which low socioeconomic(17) position can lead to disease.
Dr Mitchell said: “Green spaces can provide what is called(18) ‘restoration(19)’ for people. We know that undertaking(20) activities in these areas can reduce blood pressure(21) and tackle(22) some of the harmful(23) ways our bodies respond to(24) stress”.
“It is shown that people who take part in(25) these sorts of(26) activities in green spaces are generally healthier that those who don’t have the opportunity to do so.”
The researchers assessed(27) the population of England who were younger than retirement age(28), almost 41 million, and obtained individual mortality(29) records for 366,348 people to establish whether the association between(30) income deprivation(31), and death rates from all-causes(32), and from circulatory disease(33), lung cancer(34), and intentional(35) self-harm(36), varied according to(37) exposure to green space. Their study covered deaths in the period 2001-2005.
(1) 研究者 (2) 最も緑の多い (3) 社会的決定要因 (4) 特別号 (5) ランセット(医学雑誌の名前)
(6) 公衆衛生 (7) 保健政策 (8) ~への曝露 (9) 運動場 (10) 独立した (11) 有益な効果
(12) ~に関係した (13) 行動(=behaviors) (14) 不平等 (15) ~を利用できること (16) 経路
(17) 社会経済的な (18) いわゆる (19) 修復 (20) ~を行うこと (21) 血圧 (22) ~に対処する
(23) 有害な (24) ~に反応する (25) ~に参加する (26) これらのような (27) 評価した (28) 定年
(29) 死亡率,死亡数 (30) (~A and B)AとBの関連性 (31) 剥奪,欠乏 (32) あらゆる原因による死亡率
(33) 循環器疾患 (34) 肺癌 (35) 意図的な (36) 自傷行為 (37) ~により異なった

